Thanks for your reply Rosalyn, and sorry for being slow in responding back. Been a busy couple of weeks.

To be fair, you began your article by “playing semantics” by using two definitions as a premise to your argument for why black people can’t be racist. I just pointed out the flaws in that premise. Call it what you will, but that’s just the writer in me. Words matter.

You’re making a wildly overgeneralised (and misinformed) claim about Sweden as a country, presumably rooted in your own prejudice.

White majority doesn’t equal white supremacy.

Sweden is not run for whites, it’s run for its people (which includes relatively large amounts of “non-white” refugees taken in over the past decades). Cultures that are accommodated and catered for.

The egalitarian freedoms that Sweden offer to its people sees no colour restrictions. Its educational, legal, health, welfare, and other social systems are not build on discrimination or racial prejudice. You could even argue that many of them favour people of colour and different ethnicities because Sweden typically (at least in practice) recognises the threat of potential inequalities. Of course there’s xenophobia and racism in Sweden, I don’t believe there’s a country on earth that doesn’t have it on an individual level. No man, woman or country is perfect, but to call Sweden a “white supremacy country” is revealing gross ignorance on your side.

And by the way, I’m not particularly passionate about Sweden (even though I’m originally from there), but I am passionate about refuting misinformation and misconceptions when I see it. That’s what you’re seeing here.

I’m not sure what’s so hilarious about my example of the Pygmies and the Bantu? It demonstrates that racial/ethnic persecution occurs between and is done by all hues. It’s just one out of many examples.